Thursday, January 7, 2010

Gilchrist Squash Ball Adam Gilchrist's Squash Ball?

Adam gilchrist's squash ball? - gilchrist squash ball

If the glove Adam Gilchrist not to use your squash ball.

Posted by Norma Hammer at 7:48 PM

9 comments:

♦♦Kate J♦♦ said...

Enough is enough.
It did not serve in the past to the issue again and did not intentionally abuse a bad thing.
It was the palm trees on the street.

January 10, 2010 at 11:36 AM
I Believe in the Blue and Gold said...

Hey ..... Crickp I hope you have a rake back for Christmas, calculating the advantage of a very old ground. CPI saw and decided that is no objection. Catch up ....

Oh yes, and was in the palm of the glove, I think ......

EDIT: No, I'm on Malcolm Peed and information requested here is: I jump from the side of Fox Sports after copying using Google, Adam Gilchrist - squash ball. It was given the story 4th Here's the link: http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0, 8659 ...

Gilly clear in the case of the glove
For the team
Legislators of the 09th Night cricket in May 2007 allowed Adam Gilchrist with a squash ball in his glove eyelid, which have helped him a record 149 guests in the victory for Australia in the World Cup finals.

The Marylebone Cricket Club said Gilchrist not acted against the law or the spirit of the game has.

"Gilchrist's use of a developed squash ball was, to change the power in his bat, while in the crease, he had every right to" Read a "MCC statement.

Gilchrist was the man of the match as Sri Lanka beat Australia by 53 runs on a rain affected and a bit stupid World Cup Final 28th April in Bridgetown, Barbados.

Sri Lanka Cricket secretary Kangadaran Mathivanan objected to Gilchrist's tactic, describing it as unethical and claimed that there was an unfair advantage.

However, the MCC said the relevant rule only spoken, was what external protective equipment.

"It has been suggested that during the operation of a squash ball in his glove makes you bat like Adam basis Gilchrist then perhaps the ICC should be mandatory." - Peter Young Cricket Australia spokesman of an eyelash, helmets, pads, gloves and arm pads are all listed as permitted.

"Nobody has any definition or prescription, said the MCC.

"There is no restriction in law even in the outward form of Batting Gloves, let alone the interior thereof, no law was violated."

EDIT 2: Oh, cricketp ..... has its answer. He does not like to be provedhey ill.

January 10, 2010 at 7:33 PM
I Believe in the Blue and Gold said...

Hey ..... Crickp I hope you have a rake back for Christmas, calculating the advantage of a very old ground. CPI saw and decided that is no objection. Catch up ....

Oh yes, and was in the palm of the glove, I think ......

EDIT: No, I'm on Malcolm Peed and information requested here is: I jump from the side of Fox Sports after copying using Google, Adam Gilchrist - squash ball. It was given the story 4th Here's the link: http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0, 8659 ...

Gilly clear in the case of the glove
For the team
Legislators of the 09th Night cricket in May 2007 allowed Adam Gilchrist with a squash ball in his glove eyelid, which have helped him a record 149 guests in the victory for Australia in the World Cup finals.

The Marylebone Cricket Club said Gilchrist not acted against the law or the spirit of the game has.

"Gilchrist's use of a developed squash ball was, to change the power in his bat, while in the crease, he had every right to" Read a "MCC statement.

Gilchrist was the man of the match as Sri Lanka beat Australia by 53 runs on a rain affected and a bit stupid World Cup Final 28th April in Bridgetown, Barbados.

Sri Lanka Cricket secretary Kangadaran Mathivanan objected to Gilchrist's tactic, describing it as unethical and claimed that there was an unfair advantage.

However, the MCC said the relevant rule only spoken, was what external protective equipment.

"It has been suggested that during the operation of a squash ball in his glove makes you bat like Adam basis Gilchrist then perhaps the ICC should be mandatory." - Peter Young Cricket Australia spokesman of an eyelash, helmets, pads, gloves and arm pads are all listed as permitted.

"Nobody has any definition or prescription, said the MCC.

"There is no restriction in law even in the outward form of Batting Gloves, let alone the interior thereof, no law was violated."

EDIT 2: Oh, cricketp ..... has its answer. He does not like to be provedhey ill.

January 10, 2010 at 7:33 PM
I Believe in the Blue and Gold said...

Hey ..... Crickp I hope you have a rake back for Christmas, calculating the advantage of a very old ground. CPI saw and decided that is no objection. Catch up ....

Oh yes, and was in the palm of the glove, I think ......

EDIT: No, I'm on Malcolm Peed and information requested here is: I jump from the side of Fox Sports after copying using Google, Adam Gilchrist - squash ball. It was given the story 4th Here's the link: http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0, 8659 ...

Gilly clear in the case of the glove
For the team
Legislators of the 09th Night cricket in May 2007 allowed Adam Gilchrist with a squash ball in his glove eyelid, which have helped him a record 149 guests in the victory for Australia in the World Cup finals.

The Marylebone Cricket Club said Gilchrist not acted against the law or the spirit of the game has.

"Gilchrist's use of a developed squash ball was, to change the power in his bat, while in the crease, he had every right to" Read a "MCC statement.

Gilchrist was the man of the match as Sri Lanka beat Australia by 53 runs on a rain affected and a bit stupid World Cup Final 28th April in Bridgetown, Barbados.

Sri Lanka Cricket secretary Kangadaran Mathivanan objected to Gilchrist's tactic, describing it as unethical and claimed that there was an unfair advantage.

However, the MCC said the relevant rule only spoken, was what external protective equipment.

"It has been suggested that during the operation of a squash ball in his glove makes you bat like Adam basis Gilchrist then perhaps the ICC should be mandatory." - Peter Young Cricket Australia spokesman of an eyelash, helmets, pads, gloves and arm pads are all listed as permitted.

"Nobody has any definition or prescription, said the MCC.

"There is no restriction in law even in the outward form of Batting Gloves, let alone the interior thereof, no law was violated."

EDIT 2: Oh, cricketp ..... has its answer. He does not like to be provedhey ill.

January 10, 2010 at 7:34 PM
aflumpir... said...

I think it is near the base of the thumb. Demonstarting the other day at the Salon Cricket (TV show over lunch, games Australian)

I do not know, tell us why so many illegal ... Nothing prevents them from doing it!

January 11, 2010 at 3:25 AM
flukeyki... said...

Well, if you sqaush a ball in his glove and can be as good as Gilly, then call him a cheater!

January 11, 2010 at 1:34 PM
Bill P said...

Do not think that's important.

Its so legally and have a 8-1 Dhoni setting fields, not cricketpissa true?

January 11, 2010 at 8:50 PM
Asterix said...

Finally!
An original question ...

January 12, 2010 at 4:27 AM
Mark D said...

In the palm of your hand, hand down, I think.

January 12, 2010 at 2:13 PM

Post a Comment